mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

16K
active users

#ideologues

2 posts1 participant0 posts today

Paul St-Pierre Plamondon
@PaulPlamondon
Mark #Wiseman, engagé comme conseiller de Mark #Carney pour siéger sur son Conseil des relations canado-américaines, est le co-fondateur de l’Initiative du siècle, ce groupe d' #idéologues qui sont les artisans de la politique d' #immigration délirante qu'a appliquée le gouvernement libéral de Justin #Trudeau dans les dernières années.

Voici ce que Mark Wiseman pense du #Québec : « L'objectif d'atteindre 100 millions de Canadiens..
x.com/PaulPlamondon/status/190

X (formerly Twitter)Paul St-Pierre Plamondon (@PaulPlamondon) on XMark Wiseman, engagé comme conseiller de Mark Carney pour siéger sur son Conseil des relations canado-américaines, est le co-fondateur de l’Initiative du siècle, ce groupe d'idéologues qui sont les artisans de la politique d'immigration délirante qu'a appliquée le gouvernement

Sometimes an Ideologue Needs to Break Through to Spur Change! 🚨⚖️

In this clip from my LIVE Sharpe Way show, I discuss why ideologues are sometimes necessary to create real change. Unlike career politicians, they aren’t motivated by money and are less likely to be corrupted by the establishment. While they can be radical, they at least push the system forward.

More than 20 civil service employees resigned Tuesday
from billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency,
saying they were refusing to use their technical expertise to “dismantle critical public services.”

“We swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution across presidential administrations,”
the 21 staffers wrote in a joint resignation letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press.
“However, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments.”
The employees also warned that many of those enlisted by Musk to help him slash the size of the federal government under President Donald Trump’s administration were #political #ideologues who did not have the necessary skills or experience for the task ahead of them.

The mass resignation of engineers, data scientists, designers and product managers is a temporary setback for Musk and the Republican president’s tech-driven purge of the federal workforce.
It comes amid a flurry of #court #challenges that have sought to stall, stop or unwind their efforts to fire or coerce thousands of government workers out of jobs.

apnews.com/article/doge-elon-m

Elon Musk, left, receives a chainsaw from Argentina's President Javier Milei, right, as they arrive speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC, at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center, Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025, in Oxon Hill, Md. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
AP News · DOGE staffers resign en masse to protest Musk's slashing of federal governmentBy Brian Slodysko

I'm trying to concentrate on my #work, but I keep getting pulled away by #doomscrolling. There's even more doom to scroll these days than usual, it seems.

Much of what I'm scrolling is discussions in #science-focused spaces, started and (somewhat) moderated by people who want thoughtful and informed discussion. Often they stay that way for quite a while. But the loons always find them, and descend in hordes. Like locusts without the charisma.

#Antivax is the most common, but #creationism and #climate change denial always put in a good showing. More recent crankeries like the explosion of flat-Earthers: please don't try to tell me they're all "just trolling." Others too numerous to list.

There are the hardcore #ideologues who don't try to mask it, and the "just asking questions" crowd who are just as much true believers, minus the honesty. And another circle beyond that, people who genuinely don't know enough to know what questions to ask. Some of them might still be reachable—

—if you have the time and patience. Which I no longer do.

I did, you know, for much of my life. I'd give clear explanations, "as simple as possible but no simpler," and I've been told I was pretty good at it. Hell, I *enjoyed* doing it, and maybe still would. Answer questions. Smooth out sticking points. Engage with anyone, any time, anywhere.

I just can't anymore. And I hate that.

More and more of the people who look like they might want to learn, who can at least be given what they need to know to *start* asking the right questions, are really clever ideologues. Or they're just happy in their #ignorance. It's a trap either way.

Like I've said before: nearly everyone is ignorant about nearly everything. The sum of human #knowledge is too vast for anyone to learn more than a sliver of it in a lifetime. This is nobody's fault.

Science is fractally complicated. Each field is complicated, and each subfield is equally complicated, and each sub-sub-field ... you get the idea. No matter how much you know, you still have just as much to learn as you did at the start.

Maybe everything worth knowing is like this. Again, nobody is to blame.

But it is your fault, very much so, if you don't know anything about the subject at hand—and insist on spouting off anyway. If you react to those who know more with anger or mockery or baffled rage. If your deliberate, willful ignorance gets you and people around you killed.

So you know what? It's not my fault if I can no longer make myself care.

I'll keep on answering questions, and asking them too—and *listening* to both the questions and the answers. That's in my blood. I know there are many, many people in the world who do want to know more than they do now, and if you're still reading this, there's a fair chance you're one of them.

Everyone else can go to hell. That's where they're headed anyway, a hell they make for themselves, and the only remaining reason to try to get through is that they'll drag the rest of us with them. When that effort fails, as at the moment it manifestly is ...

Back to work. That may still be one place I can do *something*.

Continued thread

(10/N) A third category of adversaries:

☝️ Ideologues

#Ideologues want to push you to do the right thing, or to punish you for doing the wrong thing. They may also want to eliminate you, physically or metaphorically, when they can't achieve their goal: Maybe you just won't learn, or are incorrigible, as such.

The assets that you are "entitled" to are considered a reward, for conforming to the respective ideology. The portion of your assets that you aren't "entitled" to is usually the target of relentless denial, even destruction.

Entitlement is always conditional, and temporary: In case you seem to be going astray, and appeals to your conscience do not seem to have enough effect, your assets may be withdrawn or destroyed.

Hacktivists, campaigners, protagonists or minions of gender-based violence, lobbyists, racists, and terrorists fall into this category.

Not: I am not judging how "just" the respective "causes" are, I'm talking about behaviors.

(to be continued)

Start of this thread:
mastodon.de/@tuxwise/113503228

MastodonDEtuxwise (@tuxwise@mastodon.de)(1/N) With more challenging times ahead, the #4D​s will become more important, too: ✋ **Defend** your boundaries: know what matters to you, and properly safeguard it – instead of being an alert-driven option tinkerer. 🪪 **Define** yourself: use multiple identities that focus on a single purpose each – instead of having everything you do, have and think linked back directly to you. 👑 **Decide** like a sovereign: get to know your needs, and what meets them best – instead of sacrificing them to the interests of others. 🌐 **Dwell** the space: seek community, practice solidarity and citizenship – instead of being beaten a little later than others, in a glorious bunker. In the future, I'll post a few ideas and suggestions based on the 4Ds. BTW, I have dropped the adjective "#digital" from my vocabulary. There is no more separate "digital sphere" or "cyberspace" that wasn't part of our everyday lives. #privacy #security #anonymity
Continued thread

(8/N) For now, leave your spreadsheet of assets alone and turn to the second question of the #ThreatModelingManifesto:

2. What can go wrong?

The answer usually includes a list of adversaries, so you can later consider which ones you stand a chance fighting, if you think it's worth it.

Again, this may be helpful for corporations, but not that much for individuals, since damage done to individuals can be much deeper, and last for much longer, even for life.

So, lets rather consider abstract categories of adversaries from a perspective of what their primary goals are, and what they usually do to achieve them. We don't bother with specific bad actors here, nor are we considering how to "help them" via psychotherapy, legislation, imprisonment or campaigning, at this point in time.

First, the list:

A few thoughts, on each category:

🤷 You, and people like you

You and others prefer to keep asset protection efforts to a minimum. You tend to take the integrity of your assets for granted, hoping that others will respect your boundaries, either out of respect for you or because of legal regulations and repercussions. Your attitude towards handling the assets of others is equally shortsighted and careless.

As a result, your digital assets stay exposed, and you're putting others at risk, too.

(to be continued)

Start of this thread:
mastodon.de/@tuxwise/113503228

MastodonDEtuxwise (@tuxwise@mastodon.de)(1/N) With more challenging times ahead, the #4D​s will become more important, too: ✋ **Defend** your boundaries: know what matters to you, and properly safeguard it – instead of being an alert-driven option tinkerer. 🪪 **Define** yourself: use multiple identities that focus on a single purpose each – instead of having everything you do, have and think linked back directly to you. 👑 **Decide** like a sovereign: get to know your needs, and what meets them best – instead of sacrificing them to the interests of others. 🌐 **Dwell** the space: seek community, practice solidarity and citizenship – instead of being beaten a little later than others, in a glorious bunker. In the future, I'll post a few ideas and suggestions based on the 4Ds. BTW, I have dropped the adjective "#digital" from my vocabulary. There is no more separate "digital sphere" or "cyberspace" that wasn't part of our everyday lives. #privacy #security #anonymity

Two men recognized and exploited the anti-democratic loopholes within America’s rickety democracy
-- in order to deliver Republicans victories that they could never win at the ballot box.

Now their willfully minoritarian creations threaten the very essence of a representative democracy:

if Donald #Trump, rightwing courts, #gerrymandered state legislatures and an extreme Republican #caucus in the US House of Representatives create constitutional #chaos over the certification of this presidential election, 👉two men cleared the path.

The single-minded determination of #Leonard #Leo built a conservative supermajority on the US #supreme #court and ♦️stacked lower and state courts with Republican #ideologues that have pushed the nation to the right via the least accountable branch of government.

#Chris #Jankowski masterminded the partisan #gerrymanders that ♦️tilted state legislatures and congressional delegations across the south and the purple midwest toward extreme Republicans,
♦️ended Barack Obama’s second term before it started, and ♦️rendered elections in Wisconsinand North Carolina all but meaningless over the last decade and a half.

Leo and Jankowski understood, separately, that the courts and state legislatures were undervalued and often undefended targets for a deliberate strategy aimed at capturing important levers of power that sometimes float under the radar.

They could be Moneyball-ed, to borrow the term Michael Lewis used in his book about how the Oakland A’s made an end-run around large-market teams by understanding value that their opponents overlooked.

What Leo and Jankowski built separately would soon reinforce the other’s creation (with, of course, crucial assists from chief justice #John #Roberts), tightening the knots around meaningful elections, pushing policy to the extreme right and 💥making it nearly impossible for voters to do anything about it

theguardian.com/commentisfree/

The Guardian · Two men have re-engineered the US electoral system in favor of RepublicansBy Guardian staff reporter

Donald Trump is behind.

He trails in the pivotal postindustrial swing states
and is treading water in the Southern and Sun Belt states
— Arizona, Georgia and Nevada
— that could help him find an alternative path to 270 electoral votes.

In just a few months, Trump may join the exclusive club of🔸 two-time presidential losers.🔸

Of course, it is still too early to make any real prediction about November.
But the sharp reversal in Trump’s electoral fortunes raises an obvious question worth thinking about now:

❓If Trump loses, and perhaps especially if he loses badly,
what comes next for the Republican Party?❓

As striking as the relative electoral weakness of the Trump-era Republican Party
is its ♦️total inability to either govern or police the boundaries of its coalition. ♦️

Trump himself has no program beyond his own prejudices and impulses.

🔹“Build the wall” and “mass deportation now”
reflect a deep-seated hostility to nonwhite immigrants that has no basis other than #rank #bigotry.

🔹“Stop the steal” and Trump’s broader obsession with so-called election integrity
is nothing more than an attempt to operationalize his core belief that he #cannot actually #lose an election, or anything for that matter.

🔹Fittingly, the Trump-led Republican Party declined to devise a platform for the 2020 presidential election
and produced a set of Trump-esque #slogans for its 2024 one.

To the extent that there is a Republican agenda, it is a product of the hard-right #ideologues and conservative #organizations that
💥 see Trump as a willing vessel and vehicle for their own interests.💥

Trump’s leadership has also occasioned the 🔸total collapse of the boundaries 🔸(such as they were)
separating the far-right #fringe of American politics from its #mainstream.

The former president provides license for
— and inspiration to
— a large crop of right-wing extremists
who 🔥disdain democracy and openly fantasize about the use of violence 🔥
to eliminate their political opponents.

♦️“Some folks need killing,” Mark Robinson, the Republican Party’s nominee for governor in North Carolina, declared at a church event in June.

Trump’s Republican Party is a paradigmatically “#hollow” party,
according to the argument laid out by the political scientists Daniel #Schlozman and Sam #Rosenfeld
in 👉“The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics.” 👈

For all its activity, a hollow party “demonstrates fundamental #incapacities in organizing democracy.”

Its zombielike commitment to tax cuts and deregulation notwithstanding,
the Republican Party from this vantage point is little more than
💥“a personal vehicle for Trump’s vendettas and fantasies.” 💥

It offers nothing to the public, they observe, “besides praise for its leader.”

❓So what happens if and when that leader loses yet another national election for his party? ❓

What happens when,
❗️in the face of conditions that seem as favorable as they could be, ❗
the Republican coalition led by Trump 🌟still falls short?🌟
nytimes.com/2024/08/13/opinion

The New York Times · Opinion | Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old BossBy Jamelle Bouie

plus.thebulwark.com/p/mike-joh
#mikejohnson #subversiverreligiosity

#DutchSheets “is a major apostle in the #NewApostolicReformation a right-wing Christian strategist, and one of the more dangerous #ideologues of the religious right. I would argue that among those who spurred politically extreme conservative Christians to show up in Washington, D.C. on #J6 prepared to take violent action, no Christian leader was more influential than Dutch Sheets.”

The Bulwark · Mike Johnson, Polite ExtremistBy Matthew D. Taylor

#Quotes #Wealth #Luck #Ideologues

A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
When wealth is passed off as merit, bad luck is seen as bad character. This is how ideologues justify punishing the sick and the poor. But poverty is neither a crime nor a character flaw. Stigmatize those who let people die, not those who struggle to live. -Sarah Kendzior, journalist and author (b. 1 Sep 1978)

archive.ph/NbkJz
#SCOTUS #ExpandTheCourt
I grew up w/Gorsuch, Barrett & Kavanaugh types..religious #zealots at core despite what education & outer #decorum might say otherwise. These are very scary #ideologues that want to impose their #religious beliefs on all of us. Believe whatever you want, but don’t impose it on 330 million+people

w/out separation of #church & state…we’re no longer a #democracy
#supremecourt has been captured & we are all #hostage to this #atrocity #VoteBlue

Replied in thread

@pennine

Seems to me the #toriesOut have two choices

- go down guns blazing by sunsetting all these rules without considering them -making them unelectable for a very long time

- stage an internal war between sane #brexiters and insane ones (there are no non-kippers left in the Tory Parrty) to delay this madness - THEN be seen as unelectable for a very long time

Could not happen to a nicer bunch of #ideologues !

Replied in thread

@clintwatts I don't think you should feel pressured to say #Mastodon is "better." The #federated nature is (in my opinion) better than the #centralized/corporate nature of #Twitter, which we've seen is fragile in the face of #ideologues with enough money, but the #Fediverse is only as good as we make it.

Mastodon isn't a silver bullet, just like Twitter wasn't. At least with the Fediverse, if it sucks, it's our own fault, instead of being the fault of some silly billionaire.