mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

16K
active users

#philtech

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Do you have a stellar track record in #Ethics and #Philosophy of Technology (including, though not limited to, ethics of AI)? Would you like to be my colleague at University College #Dublin? Good news: @ucdphilosophy.bsky.social is hiring!

For further details and information about #UCD’s Ad Astra programme, see: ucd.ie/adastrafellows/en/ (apply via College of Social Sciences and Law section, or DM for informal enquiries). #PhilJobs #PhilTech #AIEthics ✨

www.ucd.ieUCD Ad Astra Fellows

Spitballing an idea inspired by the @melaniemitchell.bsky.social piece. To be clear, I'm not attributing the idea to her. One thing that might be missing from current LLMs that is a barrier to their achieving AGI is precisely the ability to "think" metaphorically. 1/n 🦋🦫 #PhilSci #PhilTech

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6eqjufcnopmdmucccde5aeob/post/3lceaywjv6k2t

Bluesky SocialMelanie Mitchell (@melaniemitchell.bsky.social)Professor, Santa Fe Institute. Website: https://melaniemitchell.me Substack: https://aiguide.substack.com/

#STS #PhilTech #AI #SustainableAI #TechnoSolutionism #ClimateChange #Environment: "Contrary to its perceived role as a solution, I argue that sustainable AI inadvertently perpetuates and reinforces existing structures of socio-economic exploitation and exclusion. Building on critical technology and AI studies as well as materialist thinking, I shed light on the hegemonic narratives, visions, and beliefs that ground the technological horizon of this conception. Thus adding to a critical theory of technology, the central aim of this paper is to “demystify the illusion of technical necessity” with which sustainable AI is presented and “expose the relativity of the prevailing technical choices”. The pursuit of sustainable AI is not driven by benevolent intentions for resource-friendly and ethical solutions but represents a contingent choice that emerges as the technological manifestation of the current socio-economic horizon.

Laying out this argument, the paper proceeds as follows. First, I survey the concept of sustainable AI. Second, I demystify the narratives, visions, and beliefs behind the concept by sketching three epistemological dimensions to analyze AI: AI-as-technology, AI-beyond-technology, and AI-as-ideology. Grounded in science and technology studies (STS) and philosophy of technology (PhilTech), this threefold distinction lays the foundations for a critical assessment of sustainable AI and details the ways that this conception reinforces the existing status quo. Third, I expand these insights and identify the techno-solutionist and economic narratives that facilitate the current enthusiasm for sustainable AI. Finally, I demonstrate how this enthusiasm inadvertently co-opts genuine climate solutions, creating the illusion of moving forward while being stuck within a system of economic, environmental, and social exploitation. The inevitable conclusion is that a climate-friendly future demands a different path."

ojs.weizenbaum-institut.de/ind

ojs.weizenbaum-institut.deThe Problem of Sustainable AI | Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society