mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

15K
active users

#polling

4 posts4 participants0 posts today

Polling can be misleading—are pundits misreading public opinion? Paul Krugman interviews **G. Elliott Morris**, who reveals how the "pundit's fallacy" skews insights on voters. By relying on data, not instincts, Morris explains the impact of dissatisfaction on recent elections and emphasizes understanding economic sentiments over simplistic narratives. For deeper insights, check out the full discussion [here](paulkrugman.substack.com/p/a-c). #Polling #PublicOpinion #Politics #DataDriven #ElectionInsights

Paul Krugman · A Conversation With G. Elliott MorrisBy Paul Krugman

For the first time since the start of his second term, #Trump hit 50% #disapproval in #VoteHub's #polling #aggregation today. votehub.com/polls/

Presidents have come back from this. #Reagan bottomed out at something like 30% early in his first term, and then of course won re-election in a landslide. But Trump doesn't have that kind of political acumen.

If we have anything resembling a fair #election, 2026 will be a bloodbath, and I'm willing to bet 2028 as well. If we don't, well, it will be a bloodbath of a different kind.

votehub.comPresidential Approval Aggregate & More - VoteHubTrack presidential approval, generic ballot, and more with VoteHub’s polling aggregate. Updated in real time with clear, transparent methodology.

"It is absolutely right to emphasize the importance of respecting , and try to understand them, rather than assuming that those who disagree with you are stupid or racist. But voters are not going to tell you how to the country. It is not their job. Relying on their opinions to try to deduce what to do leads not only to incoherence, but to a negative loop."

samf.substack.com/p/the-rise-o







Comment is Freed · The Rise of the GurusBy Sam Freedman
Replied in thread

@Sfwmson @peachfront
Prioritize. We need you this year in #virginia, a healthier democracy.

America is divided in 4 parts:
340.1m total july24
95.4m Not eligible to #vote under 18 + others 28.1%
89.5m Eligible did not #vote 26.2%
77.3m TrumpVance 22.7%
75.0m #HarrisWalz 22.1%
2.9m other none of above 0.9%
Sources us census, UFelectionlab, FEC
All #projections from #polling should reflect the total pop as denominator or disclose who is disregarded

Republican hatred of Democrats and of separation of church and state has significantly damaged political polling because reactionary Americans are willing to lie about their opinions if they think it helps Trump.

This has been verified repeatedly regarding Trump's obvious lies about the size of his first inauguration attendance.

online.ucpress.edu/collabra/ar

University of California PressExpressive Responding in Support of Donald Trump: An Extended Replication of Schaffner and Luks (2018)There is considerable debate about whether survey respondents regularly engage in “expressive responding” – professing to believe something that they do not sincerely believe to show support for their in-group or hostility to an out-group. Nonetheless, there is widespread agreement that one study provides compelling evidence for a consequential level of expressive responding in a particular context. In the immediate aftermath of Donald Trump’s 2017 presidential inauguration rally there was considerable controversy about whether this inauguration crowd was the largest ever. At this time, a study was conducted which found that Donald Trump voters were more likely than Hillary Clinton voters or non-voters to indicate that an unlabeled photo of Donald Trump’s 2017 presidential inauguration rally showed more people than an unlabeled photo of Barack Obama’s 2009 presidential inauguration rally, despite the latter photo clearly showing more people. However, this study was not pre-registered, suggesting that a replication is needed to establish the robustness of this important result. In the present study, we conducted an extended replication over two years after Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration rally. We found that despite this delay the original result replicated, albeit with a smaller magnitude. In addition, we extended the earlier study by testing several hypotheses about the characteristics of Republicans who selected the incorrect photo.