mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

16K
active users

Climate change is an immediate threat to the majority of the world's population.

We need a local, regional, state, national, and international "moon shot" type of concentration of effort using available resources while developing and advancing new science and technologies to counteract the damage humans have caused.

Without this type of all-out, universal cooperation, human civilization, and perhaps humanity itself, are in imminent danger of extinction.

It's these types of efforts where we need to focus basic and advanced , and , and large-scale and .

Everything, Everywhere, All at Once is the most sound and to potentially mitigate, and possibly reverse, the extreme damage we've done to our and .

It's what an means, to me.

youtu.be/1BNFaEJfFJ4

Paraphrased: "If it's not useful and to the and , it's neither nor "

The U.S., and most of the "West" / , no longer has a radical or revolutionary mindset.

Neither nor have or can deliver bold, results, only variations on what exists.

Until that is demolished, we can't hope to build the new we all desperately need.

youtu.be/5Mn5jNx4dbc

"... just get on with it, and do it now."

We are killing ourselves in literally every way possible.

That is neither nor .

Everything do, Everywhere humans are, must be reexamined, reimagined, and redone.

youtu.be/ixED010g0E4

"...we will probably* need in the future...to have everything we can get..."

and , a winning solution?

*definitely, and immediately

youtu.be/MrmASjNexdc

"That's , it's a beautiful and smart , but it's a system of give and take. We've just been taking and taking for so long, using the as our playground, that I think we've completely forgotten that we're a part of this system and, one day, in a not so distant , we're also gonna have to give back." –

We aren't separate from the and its systems, we're just a small part.

youtu.be/_KowHG5Wbgk

Doing Everything, Everywhere, All at Once is our only hope at mitigating, maybe one day reversing, the ongoing and worsening devastation of the we have caused and continue to exacerbate.

youtu.be/JeHHCVRp0m8

"We are entirely connected with and, in turn, the ...Every action, every decision we make has an impact on the around us...if you take positive [actions] to reduce your , this in turn will have a really positive effect on around the ...each of us individually are connected and...if we work together, we can have really large and positive impacts."

( because WE make that )

youtu.be/FIkcy_dqtl8

This of "old" and other includes a section related to and how it may affect the rate of spin for .

Yes, the 's rate of spin may be affected by change. Potentially catastrophic, but may be mitigated (as well as exacerbated or caused by) variations in the 's .

The segment starts at around 29:34 into the

youtu.be/AVoV0IDivAQ

A few more examples of that fit the Everything, Everywhere, All at Once and for mitigation:

youtu.be/895ixEFT3X8

I partially retract an earlier statement, this is on and our local records being shattered.

Segments of this may have been during normal but, unfortunately, this full summary is provided via a secondary or tertiary outlet.

At least they're covering this news and sharing it in an understandable format.

youtu.be/Q-8Iz6tkIx4

"My personal view is that the change is worth pursuing in the interest of slowing the negative effects on our that and is having right now. It's not free. It comes at a cost, and that's a trade-off that we have to consider when we decide to put into the ."

Nothing is free, everything has a cost. The perfect is too often the enemy of the good.

Doing Everything, Everywhere, All at Once is what we need, now.

youtu.be/CieH-gNFfSI

and other and changes can help increase the efficiency of and radically reduce the such systems use even as exponentially more people in more places are finally able to access the lifesaving benefits of artificially and more naturally cooled air.

Everything, Everywhere, All at Once abound.

youtu.be/sKbEOMCsqaI

"...what we see is that is by far the worst enemy. So yes, these things will have effects, but we should put them in that context of change."

It's critical that we implement now as many good options as we have, as widely as we can, as work on ever better continues.

We must do Everything, Everywhere, All at Once.

youtu.be/1-2TyKqP84o

Everything, Everywhere, All at Once to include producing and consuming less.

are the worst because they demand and need (e.g. planned obsolescence), then recklessly to meet that artificially inflated "need" for goods.

We must decrease our individual while also forcing to stop polluting.

Ending and our rampant consumption are both required, and more.

climatejustice.social/@breadan

Climate Justice SocialBread and Circuses (@breadandcircuses@climatejustice.social)Is this approach simply too radical to be considered? _______________________ "Reducing Consumption: The Unpopular Answer To Global Crises" Most of the proposed solutions to civilizational collapse assume stable geopolitical environments and access to large amounts of capital and resources. However, they fail to address the heart of the matter, which is ever-rising consumption. Dramatically reducing consumption is not included in these plans, except by a few advocating for degrowth. Degrowth, or negative growth, means less consumption of stuff and energy over time. Achieving a steady-state economy with lower consumption levels is essential. Either we plan for it and execute a plan that takes us down to a fraction of what we consume today, or nature will force us into a steady-state level of consumption, possibly even lower than planned. Reducing consumption is the unpopular but necessary answer to global crises. It requires rethinking our current way of life and acting in ways that prioritize sustainability and long-term stability. _______________________ The question I posed above was obviously rhetorical. But you and I know the answer. Reducing consumption is not just too radical for consideration in our capitalist culture, it's totally unthinkable. Because lowered consumption would mean less economic growth or no growth at all, and we can't have that!!! FULL ARTICLE -- https://www.energyportal.eu/news/reducing-consumption-the-unpopular-answer-to-global-crises/132528/ #Environment #Climate #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #Capitalism #Degrowth
@ricardoharvin there is a reason why I have muted breadandcircuses, but I don't remember the reason. Maybe they were trying to deflect 100% of the responsibility onto corporations.

@immibis I think in this instance you've misunderstood their position, and I'm agreeing with them on this because it's both corporations AND we consumers who generate their profits, that must make radical changes in our habits.

@ricardoharvin I definitely muted them for SOME good reason or another
Ricardo Harvin

@immibis Understandable, they do seem a bit too pleased with themselves at times, sharing their grand wisdom with us.