Just got hit with:
"But can you prove ChatGPT is *not* intelligent in the human sense?"
Oh my that old chestnut.
I am not making a claim, I am merely rejecting somebody else's claim that ChatGPT is intelligent in the human sense.
The burden of proof is on whoever claims that ChatGPT is intelligent in the human sense. That proof would also need to be accompanied by a clear, unambiguous, testable definition of what "intelligent" means, that ideally includes humans but excludes calculators.
@rysiek I will start to consider the possibility of intelligent machines when they demonstrate some curiosity.
I am looking forward to seeing what stuff like that gets included in Turing Test 2.0
And then the next step will be that we will need to build AIs that are smart enough to test AIs using Turing Test 3.0 and so ad infinitum.
Indeed, very relevant! Poignant, even!