Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
Just got hit with:
"But can you prove ChatGPT is *not* intelligent in the human sense?"
Oh my that old chestnut. 
I am not making a claim, I am merely rejecting somebody else's claim that ChatGPT is intelligent in the human sense.
The burden of proof is on whoever claims that ChatGPT is intelligent in the human sense. That proof would also need to be accompanied by a clear, unambiguous, testable definition of what "intelligent" means, that ideally includes humans but excludes calculators.
@silverwizard yeah I blogged about that:
https://rys.io/en/165.html
@rysiek @silverwizard I noticed this flip. At first it was the “AI skeptics” noting the failure to define intelligence, but suddenly I started hearing that more often as a talking point from the “AI believers”. So annoying!