Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
In discussions about clean Hydrogen, there is a popular idea floating around, particularly in countries like Germany or Japan that import large parts of their current fossil fuel energy. Instead of importing fossil fuels, the story goes, we will import large quantities of Hydrogen in the future from places where wind and sun are plentiful, and therefore, renewable energy is cheap. The problem with this idea is that Hydrogen is really difficult to transport. 
Solar collectors on half of the worlds roofs is more energy than is used today ALL SOURCES oil, nuke, wind, sun, geothermal.
Over and over the Oil industry, not just Exxon, produces lies and rumours.
One Top Lie and Rumour is "we-need-a-new-solution" to get clean energy. In news, all over our movies, they pretend there is a need for "a solution"
The solution is: End the blocks preventing the deployment of solar and wind.
Just Build It NOW!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/solar-panels-half-world-roofs-144321462.html
The article states that half of the world's rooftops could generate all of the current *electricity* needs of the world (doesn't mention the other forms of direct energy usage). Nevertheless, it points to the real problem: energy storage. That's the problem they try to solve with hydrogen, which I also don't think is a good solution. But I'm not a scientist or engineer.
Nuclear powered electricity, carbon powered electricity, geothermal powered electricity.
Energy storage cost is falling like a rock, and solar and battery together made up over 80% of new American energy construction.
Hurry on getting to the article, the dictatorship is taking them down.
___
"Solar and battery storage to make up 81% of new U.S. electric-generating capacity in 2024"