Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
@webmink @lightweight @osi I've never found OSI to be skewed on this, as a matter of policy.
I also I think the role of organizations like the Linux Foundation is different than the role of the OSI.
And projects associated with the Linux Foundation follow the policy preferences of the companies primarily funding the development.
Hence, we have a lot of "Apache 2.0 + CLA" in many LF projects these days.
That said, someone wise once wrote on the Internet:
"""
if licenses are the constitution for communities like Moglen says, this act of telling some communities they don't count as open source is patronizing and colonialist. And that's OSI's job :-)
"""
@msw @webmink @lightweight @osi uhhh, like I said elsewhere: the fediverse is so friendly, even the burns are friendly fire.