Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"Tech comms can be a business, but thinking is not selling: it requires intellectual freedom and courage. Leaving these conversations to engineers risks turning technical communication into a caricature of itself, a four-quadrant fantasy devised to lure developers into thinking that documentation is a simple pastime, yet another Jira task.</p><p>Only independent thought can help us progress and navigate uncertainty, including our future in a world where AI is injected into every domain that deals with words. Technical writers must own their problems and the conversations around them, or they will slowly fade into irrelevance, their problems absorbed by other disciplines that have more pressing problems to focus on. And if you’re reading that we should lobby more, you’re not wrong: defending knowledge requires power.”</p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/TechnicalWriting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TechnicalWriting</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/TechnicalCommunication" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TechnicalCommunication</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/SoftwareDocumentation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SoftwareDocumentation</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/CriticalThinking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CriticalThinking</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://passo.uno/tech-writing-depth-issue/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">passo.uno/tech-writing-depth-i</span><span class="invisible">ssue/</span></a></p>