mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9.6K
active users

#PythonTyping

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@europython I went through 3/4th of the proposals so far. There are *too many* interesting proposals, even more so than previous years I find. What a nice predicament to experience!

Especially excited to see (relatively) many people wanting to share their stories and retrospectives (which has been historically lacking from soloists & small teams), #eventsourcing for all knowledge levels, and more nuances on #pythontyping (it's not a yes/no story for #python ).

Sometimes I contribute types to opensource projects, and while some projects are welcoming type contributions, others either not consider it a priority or even oppose including types.

For me typing greatly improves development process. How about you?

Are you using types in your projects?

Turns out using `func(kwargs)`becomes very inconvinient, when you're using type-checking.

Pyright 1.1.312 landed a change:

> ... The new behavior matches that of mypy and assumes that the unpacked dict may supply arguments for all otherwise-unmatched keyword parameters even if they have default argument values.

github.com/microsoft/pyright/i

And now i need `# type: ignore` for each `kwargs`.

@hynek any ideas how to approach this?

Or maybe someone on ?

GitHubRegression in handling kwargs arguments · Issue #5545 · microsoft/pyrightBy last-partizan