de.hypotheses<p>How do we narrate histories of violence without oversimplifying, forcing consensus, or erasing conflict? </p><p>In this interview, Thomas Cauvin discusses <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/PublicHistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PublicHistory</span></a> as a participatory process, agonism as a tool for embracing disagreement, and why rising political pressure makes engaged history so urgent ⬇</p><p><a href="https://aggressor.hypotheses.org/1069" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">aggressor.hypotheses.org/1069</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/hypoverse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>hypoverse</span></a></p>