mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

13K
active users

#permissive

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Open for business: #Chinese firms are #Singapore-bound
"We shld also not allow the world to think tt an easy #business environment also means a #permissive one. Some hv even suggested tt #Singaporewashing – the process where foreign actors take advantage of our simple registration processes & global reputation for incorruptibility to incorp fronts for #dubiousbusiness activities – is some form of quid pro quo for investing in 🇸🇬 .. Such a mindset will come back to bite us"
scmp.com/week-asia/economics/a

South China Morning Post · Open for business: Chinese firms are Singapore-bound but will they stay?Singapore has emerged as the preferred hub for Chinese firms to expand in the region, even amid greater regulatory scrutiny and Hong Kong’s rebound.
Replied in thread

@benjamineskola

in either case, previous versions remain available.

Correct. Even if the controller of the public #git repo takes it down without warning, the community can still fork the project based on the local copies of the repo that various people have lying around.

It seems to me like the core problem is not about using a copyleft licence or not, but about assigning ownership.

It's both. If you have #permissive licensing or copyright assignment (or similar), then one entity can take their ball and go home, closing all future versions that they make. If you have #CopyLeft and you don't have copyright assignment, then they can't.

With all this #Redis fallout, it is really bothersome to see how a lot of people that are vocal about #foss values keep confusing the licensing topic with the copyright one. No #copyleft source license would be an automatic salvation in such a case to begin with - because ANY license can be changed by the copyright holder. Go ahead and hate/blame Redis Ltd. to your heart‘s content for what they did, but please, stop spreading #fud about #permissive #licensing in general.

Continued thread

And yes, after considering the mountain of evidence I decided to choose a instead of license.

In fact, I did choose the same license that @landley chose for : .

github.com/OS-1337/OS1337/blob

Since would not guarantee improvements as can be seen not only from but also @grsecurity and - .

["" is a botched and horribly outdated mess based off what they released on their website]...

web.archive.org/web/2023033112

GitHubOS1337/LICENSE.md at main · OS-1337/OS1337OS/1337 Project . Contribute to OS-1337/OS1337 development by creating an account on GitHub.

The Blue Oak Model License is the one that fits all my requirements perfectly, namely:
- it is permissive
- has patent and contribution coverage
- clear text, no legalese
- simple and modern template
- maintenance-friendly, with no personalized copyright header in the template itself
- no dreaded ALL-CAPS

Going to use it for all my projects and highly recommended to everyone else out there! 👍

blueoakcouncil.org/license/1.0

blueoakcouncil.orgBlue Oak Model License 1.0.0

The so called "strong" #copyleft philosophy is deeply unethical and has nothing to do with protecting freedom. You can twist the definition to suit your political agenda, like some do, but ultimately - your ideology is hypocritical.

If you care about the freedom and making the society better - go with #permissive licensing for your next #floss project.

If you insist on reciprocity (non-viral) for your code, at least go with #MPL - the most sane of share-alike licenses. Don't go #GPL, pls.