Facebook's "fact-checking" review and appeals process is insanely bad. I'd have sent anyone who wrote policy this ridiculous for retraining.
I posted the same post as I posted here about Hunter Biden's Laptop ( https://infosec.exchange/@lorry/114741328048838021 ) as a partly satirical and partly informative post on what those MAGA nutjobs are saying - And I got a strike for posting misinformation.
I appealed, and was told instantly that my appeal was rejected - Both of the messages Facebook sent to me pointed at a misinformation page that was nothing to do with this which is even weirder:
https://www.open.online/2025/02/06/agenzia-americana-usaid-non-ha-finanziato-politico-8-milioni-dollari-fc/
Is the link they say explains why this Hunter Biden laptop post is wrong.
I was told:
"A reviewer from our team checked your post again.
They found information that fact checkers say is missing context."
The post clearly has a whole load of context, it explains the reason for the post clearly. This crap needs nuance, or it's just removing the ability to flag misinformation by flagging it as misinformaiton.
La la laaaa. No wonder people complain about moderation!