mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

13K
active users

#Moderation

9 posts9 participants0 posts today

Would like to remind new people on this server to be mindful of our server rules when using our platform.

If its too complicated, simply treat others the way you would like to be treated.

Paktodon.Asia has no tolerance for offensive behaviour, if you can't remain decent you are not welcome.

If you need any help or guidance on how to use the platform, feel free to drop me a message and I'll share tips and help.

Have a nice day and enjoy the #Fediverse !

Loops has a pretty impressive moderation system, allowing admins to enforce fine-grained limits, and users to appeal enforcement actions.

This is just the beginning, we have big plans to make this even more powerful in future releases 😎

Hm, I filed a report against a user on another instance, to the moderation of my instance with cc to the user's instance (no, it wasn't a single user instance).

The profile has now been deleted.

But is there any way to track these things? I don't see anything in my profile or in the UI anywhere, I didn't get an email, any automated replies, notifications, whatever.

How can I see if my report even got through and what's the status?

Thousands of Facebook Groups hit by mass bans, including harmless communities like birdwatching and parenting. ⚠️

Meta blames a “technical error” — but many suspect faulty AI moderation 🤖🚫.

Can we trust AI to judge what’s safe online?

@Sarahp
@sarahprz
@Techcrunch@flipboard.com
@techcrunch@threads.net

techcrunch.com/2025/06/24/face

TechCrunch · Facebook Group admins complain of mass bans — Meta says it's fixing the problem | TechCrunch
More from Sarah Perez 💙

Facebook's "fact-checking" review and appeals process is insanely bad. I'd have sent anyone who wrote policy this ridiculous for retraining.

I posted the same post as I posted here about Hunter Biden's Laptop ( infosec.exchange/@lorry/114741 ) as a partly satirical and partly informative post on what those MAGA nutjobs are saying - And I got a strike for posting misinformation.

I appealed, and was told instantly that my appeal was rejected - Both of the messages Facebook sent to me pointed at a misinformation page that was nothing to do with this which is even weirder:

open.online/2025/02/06/agenzia

Is the link they say explains why this Hunter Biden laptop post is wrong.

I was told:
"A reviewer from our team checked your post again.
They found information that fact checkers say is missing context."

The post clearly has a whole load of context, it explains the reason for the post clearly. This crap needs nuance, or it's just removing the ability to flag misinformation by flagging it as misinformaiton.

La la laaaa. No wonder people complain about moderation!

Karoline Leavitt (Twitter)
@PressSec
This CNN story was written by the same "reporter" who wrote the very first FAKE NEWS story claiming the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation.
How did that work out for you, @NatashaBertrand?
Infosec ExchangeLorry (@lorry@infosec.exchange)Attached: 1 image Ah ha, it only took two days for the Trump administration to blame failing to bomb Iran's nuclear capability on Hunter Biden's Laptop. #US #Iran #Trump #MAGA #Leavitt #Fail #HunterBidenlaptop #Biden