Chuck Darwin<p>Trump and his advisers intend to test an obscure legal theory holding that presidents have sweeping power to withhold funding from programs they dislike.</p><p>“We can simply choke off the money,” <br>Trump said in a 2023 campaign video. <br>“For 200 years under our system of government, it was undisputed that the president had the constitutional power to stop unnecessary spending.”</p><p>His plan, known as “<a href="https://c.im/tags/impoundment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>impoundment</span></a>,” threatens to provoke a major clash over the limits of the president’s control over the budget. </p><p>The Constitution gives Congress the sole authority to appropriate the federal budget, while the role of the executive branch is to dole out the money effectively. </p><p>But Trump and his advisers are asserting that a president can unilaterally ignore Congress’ spending decisions and “impound” funds if he opposes them or deems them wasteful.</p><p>❌Trump’s designs on the budget are part of his administration’s larger plan to consolidate as much power in the executive branch as possible. </p><p>♦️This month, he pressured the Senate to go into recess so he could appoint his cabinet without any oversight. <br>(So far, Republicans who control the chamber have not agreed to do so.) </p><p>His key advisers have spelled out plans to bring independent agencies, such as the Department of Justice, under political control.</p><p><a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-impoundment-appropriations-congress-budget" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">propublica.org/article/trump-i</span><span class="invisible">mpoundment-appropriations-congress-budget</span></a></p>