Just a heads up because I've been seeing it shared around here, but a news article is claiming the SMOC (Southern Meridional Overturning Circulation) has reversed when the original paper says no such thing.
A reminder that science journalism is a difficult field of work with a lot of complex concepts and data often not successfully translating to a news article, and preconceived notions can often muddy the waters and spread misinformation or even disinformation.
I'm Team Captain Planet, but addressing climate change needs sound science and trustworthy publishing and reporting for us to have a chance at winning the fight for a sustainable world.
Doomerism breeds where falsehoods lurk. If you find research publications to be impenetrable, it's good to wait a week after extraordinary announcements to see if any scientists step up to call bullshit. If you are unfamiliar with academia, trust me when I say that scientists love calling bullshit on extraordinary claims.
https://iowaclimate.org/2025/07/06/ocean-reversal-hysteria-facts-not-included/