mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9.3K
active users

#redistribution

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

newyorker.com/magazine/2025/06

Ways to address the food crisis -
1. Minimize red meat #consumption, especially, #beef
2. Allow #fertility rates to fall and focus on #redistribution of existing #food to feed the #poor
3. Since working in #farms will soon be impossible thanks to #heatwaves #droughts #floods #pests ; build enclosed #vertical farms and #precision #fermentation

All three ideas are incorporated in #solarpunk #hopepunk #novel "A New Faith"

The New Yorker · Do We Need Another Green Revolution?By Elizabeth Kolbert

nytimes.com/2025/06/26/opinion

#idiot #thiel - it is not stagnation since end of #ww2 - but #redistribution of #opportunity #wealth #health that the #world has been doing. Long overdue! End of #colonialism #slavery in various parts. #equality for all #gender #race #religion #caste #class etc. Even before it achieves good quality of life for all, the #plutocracy hit back with rising #inequality. THAT is the problem.

The New York Times · Opinion | Peter Thiel and the AntichristBy Ross Douthat

This picture is an absurdly good example of the difference between acceptable and unacceptable levels of wealth accumulation. One can realistically use all of the house on the left, especially with family there. On the right, we see a gigantic waste of space, resources and money, the majority of which will likely rarely be touched by anyone save the cleaners.

(Pic taken from Reddit)

We should be very worried. #polish presidential #election 1st round has shown that right wing, #eu skeptics, & extreme social conservatives outnumber centrists & leftists!

Now is the time to exercise your civic power, to give hope to #poland. A potential future leader of the EU, only if we elect a centrist or leftist #president of Poland!

I’m so proud that I could vote for Magda Biejat, an incredible woman who spoke against #genocide, for wealth #redistribution and an #equitable future!

🔴 La @LDH_Fr appelle à rejoindre les rassemblements en ce #1erMai, journée internationale de lutte pour les #Droits des travailleuses et des travailleurs, partout en France.

En Sarthe, retrouvons-nous :

👉 Au Mans, 10h- Jacobins

👉 À Sablé-sur-Sarthe, 10h- mairie

👉 À La Flèche, 10h30- promenade Foch

👉 À La Ferté-Bernard, 10h30- gare

Exigeons de véritables réponses aux attentes émancipatrices de la population, pour la coopération (nationale et internationale) face aux #ExtrêmesDroites et ses politiques construites sur la loi du plus fort, pour répondre aux besoins de #Redistribution des richesses au sein de chaque pays et avec des #Solidarités mondiales.

Fairness Across the World openaccess.nhh.no/nhh-xmlui/bi
"… the meritocratic #fairness view is not universally accepted, and plays only a marginal role in many countries, especially outside of the Western world.
#meritocracy is particularly prominent in richer countries
… people’s belief about the source of #inequality is crucial for whether they consider inequality in their society to be fair, but we also establish that these beliefs are particularly important in countries where people endorse the meritocratic fairness views
… It appears plausible that the meritocratic fairness view is conducive to economic #growth
… cross-country differences in #redistribution through taxes and transfers also are associated with differences in fairness views, with more redistribution in countries with a higher share of meritocrats, which highlights the importance of incorporating #heterogeneity in both fairness preferences and beliefs when studying the political economy of redistribution
… people’s view on redistribution is primarily driven by fairness considerations, the perception that inequality in their country is unfair, rather than #efficiency considerations"
#ExperimentalEcon

Artificial Intelligence, the Collapse of Consumer Society, and Oligarchy d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izad
"The pace of progress in artificial intelligence has resurrected worries about the end of work. Some people call for an egalitarian society based on universal basic income, while others think regulation should curb the use of #AI.
… While, in partial equilibrium, they would benefit from AI as replacement of the knowledge workers they need to operate their business, in general equilibrium massive use of AI might be self defeating because it would lead to a collapse of the middle class of #skilledWorkers and therefore of the market base for mass produced goods.
… If influence depends on the number of agents exerting influence ("one person, one vote"), AI will prevail and be supplemented with #UBI, provided fiscal capacity is large enough to fund for such UBI. If fiscal capacity does not allow for enough #redistribution, then the #oligarchy may want to curb AI so as to maintain a high enough demand for skilled workers, so as to preserve the market base for mass produced goods.
… If influence is chiefly driven by monetary contributions ("one dollar, one vote"), AI is likely to prevail and no UBI will be implemented, because producers of necessities, who do not value the existence of a large middle class, will outbid producers of more sophisticated goods in the competition to obtain one’s most preferred outcome.… "
#economics

Replied in thread

"Une profonde réorientation des politiques #antitrust, inspirée par des représentants de l’école de Chicago comme Richard Posner ou Robert Bork. Auteurs en 1978 respectivement de Antitrust Law : an Economical Perspective et de The Antitrust Paradox, ils argumentent que la concentration et les fusions de grandes entreprises bénéficient aux consommateurs. Ils réussissent à imposer la doctrine du « bien-être du consommateur » (consumer welfare), selon laquelle les monopoles et les grandes fusions sont légitimes tant que les entreprises concernées peuvent argumenter qu’elles se traduiront par des baisses de prix. C’est le début d’une grande vague de concentrations, alimentée par le boom des marchés financiers, qui se poursuit encore aujourd’hui. Aux États-Unis et bientôt en Europe, les autorités de concurrence approuvent sans trop sourciller tous les projets de fusion qui leur sont présentés et se préoccupent surtout de faire la chasse aux aides d’État et aux monopoles publics. Symbole de ce changement d’époque : Exxon et Mobil, les deux principaux héritiers de la Standard Oil, refusionnent en 1999 avec la bénédiction du président Bill Clinton. En 2005, cinq des sept entreprises issues du démantèlement de AT&T en 1982 sont à nouveau regroupées, et reprennent le nom de AT&T. Deux autres s’unissent pour former son principal concurrent, Verizon.

"Ce n’est qu’avec l’essor du numérique que la lutte contre les monopoles revient finalement sur le devant de la scène. Dès les années 1990, la législation antitrust est utilisée pour forcer Microsoft à renoncer en partie à sa stratégie consistant à profiter de la position dominante de son système d’exploitation Windows pour contrôler également le marché des logiciels et notamment de la navigation sur le web."

Extrait du livre collectif co-dirigé par @OlivPetitjean #ObservatoireDesMultinationales et @IvanDuRoy #Basta : multinationales.org/fr/enquete

Observatoire des multinationalesTrust et antitrust : une guerre de cent ans toujours en cours 1901. Dans la lignée des empires économiques construits autour du chemin de fer, industriels, banquiers de Wall Street et avocats d'affaires orchestrent la création aux États-Unis d'immenses monopoles dans (…)
Replied in thread

@MoiraEve

#TrumpCoup by the #TrumpMuskDuumvirate
#USpol
#Tariffs #Economics

(2/n)

...#redistribution, "trickling up", of wealth, and power(!), to the #TechnoFeudalists 1) and #oligarchs

b) a massive weaking of #US influence globally, as #tRump alienates its closed allies, e.g. #NATO and #Canada/ #Mexico, continuously showing how unreliable the #US are as a partner.

c) a further reduction in product and service quality (#Shrinkflation,) as....

1)
youtube.com/watch?v=SMSNpq4K67o

Continued thread

有象友整理记录了事件起因
wxw.moe/@jigsaw/11388386808119

真的很讨厌把事实和个人情感黏着在一起,把个人期望当作现实、然后诉诸人文表达来歪曲事实
这整件事里:
1. #RSS 索引在版权法上完全站得住脚,不需要任何「互联网精神」辩护
2. #搜索引擎 经过无数判例也明确地符合版权法,它只索引不是 #再分发#redistribution);索引确实要缓存内容,但没有再分发就不侵犯版权,访问者点了搜索结果还是得去原始链接页面访问;robots.txt只是个「君子协定」并不代表授权声明没有法律效力
3. #被遗忘权 是真的,作者有权要求搜索引擎删除,如果对方拒绝那确实可以骂也可以告
4. 扣帽子不对、用「极端女权」骂人也不对,这些都应当单拎出来批判,但这和RSS索引本身合法性无关,对方骂人不对不代表对方索引违法,两件事没有逻辑关系
5. 法律是最低共识,要么认可法律、接受版权法的保护同时接受其规定的豁免;要么不认可法律豁免同时也别期望版权法保护。有理拍律书无理拍桌子东食西宿cherry picking的论述手段很没道理,想靠巧言令色让自己的一厢情愿成为新共识令人不齿

呜呜 w(> ʌ <)wJigsaw (@jigsaw@wxw.moe)@board@ovo.st 最近这两起侵权收录事件,https://o3o.ca/@layonleaf/113881597150941392 这位总结得算是比较详细,我就不再转述。我只能说到底哪边过激,看完这条嘟文里的所有链接就知道了。 像这种大跨站讨论,Fedi 的问题就暴露出来了,要在不同站之间疯狂切换…… --- 时间线(UTC+8) 2024年8月 「再會,謝謝所有的魚」发邮件给「川流」网站。川流先开骂「极端女权」,然后象友在网上发布川流的个人信息,随后川流留下挂人页面关站,风波停歇。 2025.1.23 00:00 @HashBrown 发布内容指出 SaveWeb 存档未经同意,寻找其他被侵权博主,随即其下的评论对「IT男」略微语气不逊。 1.23 09:00 SaveWeb 注册账号回应,未得谅解。最后于 12:00 于其 Telegram Channel 发表公告指 @HashBrown 等人为「极端女权」,并且其下评论出格。 一些被未告知收录的博主在博客发表版权声明。 之后诸多博主讨论此事,最后上升到「互联网精神」「黄金时代」云云。 1.25 SaveWeb 发公告道歉,称自己是受「川流」的影响才误称「极端女权」。 教训:【勿因类似事件先入为主叠加情绪 ,两边都有人因川流事件的前提上来不好好说话】 --- 我的想法:想让文字在限定范围传播的同时又想要让尽可能多的人看到本来就是不现实的,不然全世界的传播学研究者、情报机构全得失业。 SaveWeb 已经很道德了(单指爬虫行为,背地里扣帽子绝对不妥),搜索引擎与社交网络巨头可不会给你回复半个字,悄眯眯爬取炼 LLM 更是家常便饭。 【重要的点:机器人不会读取你写的「转出死全家」等辱骂,请使用 robots.txt noarchive WAF 等方法。而且这些也都是防君子不防小人,想绝对不被传播唯有不发布。】

"Mr McDonnell said Ms should accept the need for a wealth tax to tackle “the grotesque inequality that we have within our society — 16 million living in poverty, and yet at the same time, we’ve now created in our society 165 billionaires.”
“And on the last calculation I saw, in the two years from 2020 to 2022, they made an additional £150 billion of wealth,”
“I think you have to look at .”

morningstaronline.co.uk/articl

Underrated view of #socialSecurity in both major #US political parties:

Via @profgalloway “...people that need [it] ...should get it. But for a lot of people, it's an upgrade from Carnival Cruises to Crystal. ...the upper quartile of seniors ...shouldn't get it.”

His argument for this view starts around 7:19 on @preetbharara's #podcast from April 2024:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/