@heiseonline dann git's auch kein #Providerprivileg & #Hosterprivileg gem. #Section230 & #OCILLA mehr und #Musk ist persönlich für jeden Post auf #Shitter haftbar!

"#FuckAroundAndFindOut" auf höchstem Level würd' ich dazu sagen...

@EposVox @absolutejank@mastodon.social @arstechnica

#Twitch in that regard is even worse than #YouTube towards people like #JimSterling when it comes to false #DMCA claims...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trIn90HTqKs

Because in that case YouTube solely complies with #OCILLA and deciding to not give a shit until the defendant lawyers up and sues them...

Twitch banning any kind of reasonable advertising is just shit, because it's not done to comply with any laws or regulations whatsoever...

@vantablack #Copyrightmafia will want a word about that.

It's not 2010 anymore where #YouTube was willing to give #GEMA and other rentseeking "collecting angencies" the finger and tell them to properly file #DMCA claims amd go after the users cuz #OCILLA doesn't make the hoster liable.

But then again #FBI also went after #Megaupload despite them actually taking down stuff...

@wbm312 I think #DMCA & #OCILLA are good enough:

Copyrighted material gets yeeted offline and that's it.

@netzpolitik_feed ich denke dass diese - genauso wie bei #Urheberrechtsverstößen dahingehend haften, wenn diese wissentlich jene Inhalte verbreiten.

Genauso wie #OCILLA nur solange greift bis ne #DMCA notice kommt...

@ArneBab @jeff@newsie.social @BNetzA After all, #OCILLA-esque "we're just a provider" protections only apply as long as they can plausibly evidence the didn't knew of anything wrong.