mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

10K
active users

#burdenofproof

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Tom Capuder<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Paxil" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Paxil</span></a></span> </p><p>AI, like humans, will be unable to definitively prove the non-existence of *anything*. </p><p><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a> </p><p>______________________<br><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/atheism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>atheism</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/faith" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>faith</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/god" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>god</span></a></p>
Tom Capuder<p>Theists: </p><p>Happy <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/SacrilegeSunday" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SacrilegeSunday</span></a>! </p><p>How can we tell that your faith-based <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/beliefs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>beliefs</span></a> are anything more than simply imagination and wishful thinking? <br><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/OccamsRazor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OccamsRazor</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a> </p><p>______________________<br><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/atheism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>atheism</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/faith" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>faith</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/god" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>god</span></a></p>
WIST Quotations<p><a href="https://wist.info/huxley-thomas-henry/5768/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">A quotation from <b>T. H. Huxley</b></a></p><blockquote>Agnosticism is not properly described as a “negative” creed, nor indeed as a creed of any kind, except in so far as it expresses absolute faith in the validity of a principle which is as much ethical as intellectual. This principle may be stated in various ways, but they all amount to this: that it is wrong for a man to say that he is certain of the objective truth of any proposition unless he can produce evidence which logically justifies that certainty. This is what Agnosticism asserts; and, in my opinion, it is all that is essential to Agnosticism.</blockquote><p><b>T. H. Huxley</b> (1825-1895) English biologist [Thomas Henry Huxley]<br>Essay (1889-06), “Agnosticism and Christianity,” <i>The Nineteenth Century</i> magazine, Vol. 25, No. 148</p> <p>Sourcing, notes: <a href="https://wist.info/huxley-thomas-henry/5768/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">wist.info/huxley-thomas-henry/…</a></p><p><a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=quote" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quote</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=quotes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quotes</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=quotation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quotation</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=qotd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>qotd</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=thhuxley" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>thhuxley</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=agnostic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>agnostic</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=agnosticism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>agnosticism</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=burdenofproof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>burdenofproof</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=certainty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>certainty</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evidence</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=objectivity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>objectivity</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=proof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>proof</span></a> <a href="https://my-place.social/search?tag=truth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>truth</span></a></p>
Nonilex<p>🚨In <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/civil" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>civil</span></a> proceedings, any individual subject to <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/denaturalization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>denaturalization</span></a> is NOT entitled to an <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/attorney" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>attorney</span></a>, Robertson said; there is also a lower <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a> for the govt to reach, &amp; it is far easier &amp; faster to reach a conclusion in these cases.</p><p>Robertson says that stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/DueProcess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DueProcess</span></a> &amp; infringes on the rights guaranteed by the <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/14thAmendment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>14thAmendment</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/immigration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>immigration</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Constitution" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Constitution</span></a></p>
C.<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mstdn.ca/@theteapixie" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>theteapixie</span></a></span> </p><p>An argument can be made about mentally ill who pose a danger to themselves or others, and whether they should be confined for treatment against their will. I'm not advocating for or against that.</p><p>However, locking up accused people until trial just because they've been charged with something is a non-starter. They haven't been convicted of anything yet! All the government would have to do is charge you with a phony crime, and they can lock you away for years? No thanks.</p><p>If someone is out on conditions - bail, parole, whatever form of supervised release - and they violate those conditions, then you may have justification to confine them. It would depend on the circumstances.</p><p>But "lock up everyone ever charged before conviction" is autocratic dictator bullshit.</p><p><a href="https://mindly.social/tags/justice" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>justice</span></a> <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/innocent" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>innocent</span></a> <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/guilty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>guilty</span></a> <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/charged" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>charged</span></a> <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
JdeB [216.91 ppm]<p>699 <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateEmergency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateEmergency</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p><p>Who has the burden of proof on the <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateBreakdown" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateBreakdown</span></a>.<br>An argument by a 'commedian' 14 yrs old.</p><p>"Burden of Proof | David Mitchell's Soapbox" [2:59 min]<br>by David Mitchell's Soapbox [Sep 15, 2011]</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI5ulKiZAoE" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=SI5ulKiZAo</span><span class="invisible">E</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/TakeCareForLife" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TakeCareForLife</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/TakeCareForEarth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TakeCareForEarth</span></a> <br><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/StopBurningThings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StopBurningThings</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/StopEcoside" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StopEcoside</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/StopThePlunder" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StopThePlunder</span></a><br><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateBreakDown" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateBreakDown</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/StopRapingNature" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StopRapingNature</span></a></p>
Tom Capuder<p>Theists: <br>What is asserted without <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evidence</span></a> can be dismissed without evidence.</p><p>The ball remains in your court.<br><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a> </p><p>___________________<br><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/atheism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>atheism</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/faith" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>faith</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/god" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>god</span></a></p>
Gemma ⭐️🔰🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🎐<p>YouTube has decided to serve me up videos about <a href="https://mstdn.plus/tags/atheism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>atheism</span></a> today, and I don't think I'll ever really understand how it ever came to be that in a modern technological society, we are still being put into the position of being forced to justify <a href="https://mstdn.plus/tags/nonbelief" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nonbelief</span></a> in things for which there is no <a href="https://mstdn.plus/tags/evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evidence</span></a> of <a href="https://mstdn.plus/tags/existence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>existence</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://mstdn.plus/tags/OnusProbandi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OnusProbandi</span></a>. The <a href="https://mstdn.plus/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a> of epistemological truth is upon the person who makes the assertion. Atheism asserts nothing, at all. "There is no $deity," is not an assertion of anything.</p>
MikeWas<p>The law does NOT require them to send you "proof" of the debt after you dispute. </p><p>It does not require them to send you proof of ownership. </p><p>It does not require them to send you a wet-ink contract. </p><p>It does not require them to send you anything at all, besides the most basic information about your account.</p><p>The only time they have to prove anything is... when they're in court.</p><p>👇</p><p><a href="https://esq.social/tags/FDCPA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FDCPA</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/DebtCollectors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DebtCollectors</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
MikeWas<p>Here's the link for the sign-up:</p><p><a href="https://ricardolaw.com/fdcpa-course-sign-up" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">ricardolaw.com/fdcpa-course-si</span><span class="invisible">gn-up</span></a></p><p><a href="https://esq.social/tags/FDCPA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FDCPA</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/DebtCollectors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DebtCollectors</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
MikeWas<p>Then you find a way to sue them. </p><p>We've got a free email course on the 53 ways a debt collector might break the law in a way that allows you to sue them. And when you sue them, you get to expose the fact that they can't prove the debt. (And that, too, is a violation by them.)</p><p>Want to find out how to take a debt collector to court? Go to the link below.</p><p><a href="https://esq.social/tags/FDCPA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FDCPA</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/DebtCollectors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DebtCollectors</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
MikeWas<p>If they sue you for the debt, then yes, they'll have to bring evidence of the debt and their right to collect. </p><p>But what if they don't sue you? What if you still want proof?</p><p>👇</p><p><a href="https://esq.social/tags/FDCPA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FDCPA</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/DebtCollectors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DebtCollectors</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
MikeWas<p>Debt collectors don't have to prove anything to you.</p><p>There's only one time a debt collector has to prove anything, and it's never in response to a letter or other dispute from you.</p><p>👇</p><p><a href="https://esq.social/tags/FDCPA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FDCPA</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/DebtCollectors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DebtCollectors</span></a> <a href="https://esq.social/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
Bo Morgan<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://kolektiva.social/@DamienMarieAtHope" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>DamienMarieAtHope</span></a></span> </p><p>Given the state of public education in the United States, if you are a US citizen, the burden of self-education is on you.</p><p>Don't be an idiot.</p><p>Ask questions if you don't understand or don't know.</p><p><a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/education" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>education</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/publiceducation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>publiceducation</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/politics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>politics</span></a> <a href="https://kolektiva.social/tags/burdenofproof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>burdenofproof</span></a></p>
WIST Quotations has moved!<p>A quotation from Russell, Bertrand:</p><p>«<br>Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my as…<br>»</p><p>Full quote, sourcing, notes: <br><a href="https://wist.info/russell-bertrand/5372/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">wist.info/russell-bertrand/537</span><span class="invisible">2/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://zirk.us/tags/quote" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quote</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/quotes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quotes</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/quotation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quotation</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/burdenofproof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>burdenofproof</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/orthodoxy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>orthodoxy</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/dogma" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>dogma</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/proof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>proof</span></a></p>
Answers in Reason<p>This Sunday on YouTube: Discussion and The Burden of Proof!: Answers In Reason </p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4xMmKeM9yHY" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">youtube.com/shorts/4xMmKeM9yHY</span><span class="invisible"></span></a><br> </p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/a6rh57gwyqi" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">youtu.be/a6rh57gwyqi</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> this video is over 10 minutes so i'll have to cut it down to put on tiktok New TikTok: <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@answersinreason/video/7162265062776917254#promo" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">tiktok.com/@answersinreason/vi</span><span class="invisible">deo/7162265062776917254#promo</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/bop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bop</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/discussion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>discussion</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/justification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>justification</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://masto.nu/tags/TikTok" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TikTok</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/General" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>General</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/Discussion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Discussion</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/Justification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Justification</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/Evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Evidence</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/EpistemicJustification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>EpistemicJustification</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/proof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>proof</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/BurdenofJustification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenofJustification</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/BOJ" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BOJ</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/BurdenofProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenofProof</span></a> <a href="https://masto.nu/tags/BOP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BOP</span></a></p>
Steve Dustcircle 🌹<p>Unprepared <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Christian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Christian</span></a> Botches <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/BurdenofProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenofProof</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm4i87owGe8" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=gm4i87owGe</span><span class="invisible">8</span></a></p><p>Keen to convince the skeptical hosts of <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Christianity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Christianity</span></a>'s preeminence, Alexander lauds its prophecies and <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Jesus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Jesus</span></a>' resurrection as self-evident truths everyone recognizes. But when pressed on specifics, he ducks and weaves, unable to name chapters validating his claims or the scholars he loosely cites.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/atheism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>atheism</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/atheist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>atheist</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evidence</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/religion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>religion</span></a></p>
Tom Capuder<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@riggbeck" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>riggbeck</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mstdn.party/@lednabwm" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>lednabwm</span></a></span> </p><p>It is not the job of atheists to prove nonexistence of a god. </p><p>Theist = holds a belief in god(s)<br>A+theist = doesn't</p><p>That's all it is. We aren't convinced that YOUR claims are true. If you can't prove 'em, we needn't disprove 'em.</p><p><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/BurdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BurdenOfProof</span></a></p>
SLCW💥<p>In the <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/UnitedStates" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UnitedStates</span></a>, the <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/burdenOfProof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>burdenOfProof</span></a> is on the "accuser" — which is a "bedrock principle of our entire system."</p><p>That said, the fact that Rep. <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/RalphNorman" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RalphNorman</span></a> (R-SC) got this wrong helps shed some light on his party's evidence-free <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/impeachment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>impeachment</span></a> crusade: It appears some <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/Republicans" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Republicans</span></a> expect <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/Biden" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Biden</span></a> to somehow come up with even more <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>evidence</span></a> of his <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/innocence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>innocence</span></a>, rather than expecting the <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/GOP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GOP</span></a> to produce evidence of <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/wrongdoing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>wrongdoing</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/house-goper-flubbed-the-basics-on-burdens-of-proof-columnist-2666606942" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">rawstory.com/house-goper-flubb</span><span class="invisible">ed-the-basics-on-burdens-of-proof-columnist-2666606942</span></a></p>
EURACTIV Technology<p>EU updates product liability regime to include software, Artificial Intelligence <a href="https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-updates-product-liability-regime-to-include-software-artificial-intelligence/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=mastodon" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">euractiv.com/section/digital/n</span><span class="invisible">ews/eu-updates-product-liability-regime-to-include-software-artificial-intelligence/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=mastodon</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/artificialintelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>artificialintelligence</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/burdenofproof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>burdenofproof</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/ProductLiabilityDirective" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ProductLiabilityDirective</span></a></p>