@fanime Well, that was fascinating, thanks! What leapt out at me was the military café chain which doubled as a revolutionary network—I had an idea of the Turkish army's peculiar position in politics, but I had no idea it went back to the janissaries, and in some way survived their suppression! Should we be looking more closely into the ownership of Starbucks?
@fanime "Historians have now largely moved away from the bio-
logical essentialism that emphasises the tastiness of chocolate, addictiveness of
tobacco and the medicinal properties of cof ee or the economic determinism
that highlights increasing commercialisation in the age of mercantilism as the
primary cause for the dif usion and appropriation of these substances, toward
cultural functionalism that gives primacy to the social context in which they
were appropriated by local cultures." ← is this a comment on what historians currently think is most significant, i.e. are cultural forces now considered more powerful than economic in the appropriation of coffee etc.? Or is it a comment on what historians consider interesting, or under-researched; i.e. in the past they concentrated on economics or biological essentialism, and now they are more interested in other factors? (meant to send this to you but posted it instead!)