Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

16K
active users

mstdn.social: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.4

Public
Panoptykon

Można podpisać petycję, żeby TikTok ograniczył szkodliwość swojej działalności #FixTikTok od @edri eupolicy.social/@edri/11398597

*przeczytawszy uprzednio naszą analizę raportu z oceny ryzyka tego VLOP-a:
panoptykon.org/obowiazkowe-oce

EUpolicy.social - A Mastodon server for the EU bubbleEDRi (@edri@eupolicy.social)On #SaferInternetDay 🌐 today, we're joining Amnesty International in urging #TikTok to make its platform safer by: ❌ banning personalised ads aimed at its younger users ❌ not using people’s sensitive personal information to create an addictive timeline. Sign the petition to #FixTikTok! ✍🏿 You can help make a difference. Sign Amnesty's petition and call on TikTok to prioritise the mental health and well-being of its young users ⤵️ https://www.amnesty.org/en/petition/make-tiktok-safer/
Public
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@panoptykon czy naprawdę wciąż wierzymy w petycje na Berdyczów do Big Techów, żeby łaskawie się zmieniły odrobinę?

Przecież to zawsze obiecanki cacanki.

Google i szkodliwe AI:
bbc.com/news/articles/cy081nqx

Facebook i fact-checking, mowa nienawiści:
oko.press/facebook-instagram-h

Przepraszam, ale naprawdę chyba szkoda energii.

Zamiast tego, chętnie podpiszę petycje o zmianę regulacji prawnych. Tak, żeby te zmiany były poza kontrolą tych korporacji.

An anti-tank weapon is strapped to a robot dog during a US Marines test
www.bbc.comGoogle ending AI arms ban incredibly concerning, campaigners sayThe tech giant previously ruled out applications that were "likely to cause harm".
Public
Panoptykon

@edri Could you pls explain why a petition? An expert-follower expressed doubts whether a petition can actually make a change (more than regulations).
@rysiek

Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@panoptykon @edri let me voice my concern here myself then:

I am surprised that at this point in time – after decades of this kind of work, and with the results of a lot of it being rolled back within days by Meta (fact-checking, hate speech, etc[1]) and Google (AI weapons[2]) – we're still "petitioning" the technological giants.

I would much prefer a regulatory push, instead of asking those making money on causing harm to kindly stop.

[1] about.fb.com/news/2025/01/meta
[2] bbc.com/news/articles/cy081nqx

Meta · More Speech and Fewer Mistakes | MetaWe're ending our third party fact checking program and moving to a Community Notes model.
Feb 11, 2025, 05:47 PM·Quiet public·Web
0boosts·6favorites
Quiet public *
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@panoptykon @edri I would go as far as to say: not only does this seem to me to be wasted effort, it would sem to me to be actually harmful.

It lets these companies introduce small changes on their own terms, which they get to revert whenever they like – while at the same time disarming any push for regulatory changes that could, perhaps, take this decision out of their hands.

They have proven time and again they are actively, intentionally malicious; that's how we should treat them.

ExploreLive feeds
About