So much discussion on about who the authors are of the Ayodhya judgment.

Font preferences and formatting preferences certainly contain a clue.

The lead judgment is likely authored (or atleast compiled-in-chief) by Justice Chandrachud.

The addendum is likely authored by Justice Ashok Bhushan

@prasanna_s we just need to look at the meta data of the document. Maybe they left their name

DYC again tripped again....
But who wrote the operative part?

@prasanna_s I thought its just the opposite..that Bhushan wrote the judgment and DYC the addendum.

@prasanna_s There are 124 places where the spelling is "judgment" and 27 places where it is "judgement".

@prasanna_s Similarly, immovable - 24, immoveable - 36.

@prasanna_s so why does that have any relevance. It’s a group of Supreme Court justices and their collective unanimous decision is this. Each one of them are part of this history and they are complicit.

@prasanna_s and this judgement is even called 'nuanced' but how?

@prasanna_s Isn't the director of the film #modi n #shaw? Given the #bjp's Bold stand tt d SC is in their pockets?

...#judiciary SHOULD hv Refused 2 take d case; n insisted tt it b settled thro #Mediation. THEN #judiciary cd hv Maintained a gd name.

BUT, #judiciary has worked Hard @ Spoiling its own name!

@prasanna_s is it true that there is no precedence of judgment without mentioning author judges

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Welcome on Mastodon. We are just another another Mastodon server in the federated universe called the fediverse. Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our guidelines.