"These repositories are available under the same BSL license as Sentry’s core repos."
So... It will *become* open source... eventually... in about 4 years or so.
#FreeSoftware #OpenSource #FOSS #OSS #SoftwareFreedom #SourceAvailable
"Open Source" can't just be about using the goodwill of a very desirable common label for software goods. It's an integral part of keeping the developer ecosystem healthy.
And "healthy" can't only be about profitability for companies.
http://radar.oreilly.com/2006/08/open-source-architecture-or-go.html
#FreeSoftware #OpenSource #FOSS #OSS #SoftwareFreedom
The following authors note has been added to the blog post in response to the feedback given above via GitHub.
#FreeSoftware #OpenSource #FOSS #OSS #SoftwareFreedom
@msw 'currently'...
@kevin yup. Like SSPLv1 is not currently approved, nor was it formally rejected... Right?
@msw I thought Eric trademarked the term to prevent abuse like that
@msw If they braneded it as "source-available", I think it would be more honest. And as an on-and-off free-software contributor, I would be happy if most software were merely source-available.
@msw so basically, "we know it's not open source, but using that term made us feel better"
@msw Given the types of terms the OSI seems to be happy with for machine learning models, I kind of wonder how effectively they can push back against things like this in the future...