mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

12K
active users

in (no restrictions on use, gives broad permission for things we never imagined, like training models), compressed via a training process, and then Responsible AI Model (use restrictions) out.

Arguably it has some better properties than a model that is only available via an API, which *also* likely comes with acceptable use policies in a user agreement.

Personally, I'd prefer laws instead of licenses / contracts.

twitter.com/BigCodeProject/sta

TwitterBigCode on Twitter“The SantaCoder models are licensed under an open & responsible AI license (OpenRAIL). These are AI-specific licenses enabling free use and distribution of the model while setting specific use restrictions (e.g. malware generation). cc @ResponsibleAIL FAQ: https://t.co/7Jocj6XZ1X”

For such a new license, -M already has many variations in released artifacts. There's the OpenRAIL-M with upgrade requirements, originally used for 1.4 and 1.5, then OpenRail++-M used for StableDiffusion 2.0.

Now the "CodeML Open RAIL-M v0.1 License".

License Proliferation (e.g., ⬇️ from @sogrady) has been a real problem for the and software community, especially in remixing components with mutually incompatible terms.

redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/08/06

tecosystemsGoogle Code vs License ProliferationOk, so the answer to the question of why is license proliferation. I’m a bit dubious, as I think the prohibition of AGPL licenses for one is about more than preventing license proliferation – which I’m fine with, candidly, I’d just like to see the reasoning stated more clearly – but let’s go with it.

I'll need to diff this new version when I'm on a proper computer, unless @luis_in_brief (who is credited in the paper as contributing to the model license) can summarize the differences in tradition. 😉
huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/

huggingface.coLicense - a Hugging Face Space by bigcodeDiscover amazing ML apps made by the community

@luis_in_brief an aside: there's a now license naming conflict in my brain... Before these AI / ML model licenses emerged, my brain mapped "model license" to "this is a license that models good practices", like the Blue Oak Model License in particular.
blueoakcouncil.org/license/1.0

blueoakcouncil.orgBlue Oak Model License 1.0.0

What's up with the numbering in this license?

Oh. The .txt version has different identifiers than all the others.

I suppose I'll do a comparison form the Word doc, rather than the plain text.
huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/

@msw you can file an issue you know ;)

@luis_in_brief I'm doing that. Just got interrupted before hitting "submit".

@luis_in_brief There are some changes in Section II: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in this "CodeML Open RAIL-M v0.1 License" when compared to:

- "CreativeML Open RAIL-M++" dated November 24, 2022 or
- "CreativeML Open RAIL-M" license dated August 22, 2022, or
- "BigScience Open RAIL-M License" dated August 18, 2022, or
- "BigScience RAIL License v1.0" dated May 19, 2022.

@luis_in_brief The definition of "Licensor" has changed. CodeML Open RAIL-M is on the right.