Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
mstdn.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

16K
active users

mstdn.social: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.4

Public
Pagan Witch

@davidrevoy I mentioned this topic to my friend and they did some digging and it looks like it was a huge misunderstanding on Deviantart's side? Apparently people who manage their official Twitter fucked up the announcement.

Here is a link to the latest reblogs: at.tumblr.com/thefloatingstone

There is more to it tho: at.tumblr.com/drawingden/your-

There even is a form to fill if you want to opt out: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

Public
David Revoy

@the_luck_witch Oh yes, I agree (read this thread mastodon.art/@reinderdijkhuis/ for more) and they backpedaled a lot since the original announcement. (src. deviantart.com/team/journal/UP ) but still, what a communication mess at the scale of a community. A big bullet in their own foot could have been avoided with more communication and a better default option right of the box.

Also, all my artworks from DeviantArt are easy to find on haveibeentrained.com/ , so I guess the evil is already done...😔

Mastodon.ARTReinder Dijkhuis Does Art (@reinderdijkhuis@mastodon.art)Before I go to bed, a summary of how I see the #DeviantArt thing: If you're a DA user, you have NOT been opted into all your art being used to train other party's AI art engine, or DA's own new one. Instead, DA has added a checkbox to their art submission UI that you can use to ask other sites, nicely, not to scrape it for use to train AI art engines like those other sites have probably been doing for the past year. It won't do a lot of good but there's no new harm being done here.
Quiet public
Pagan Witch

@grob @davidrevoy @aral TBH if they create an AI that takes into consideration an option to honor artists consent in regard to building its database and on top of that credits the artists it learned from its fine by me.

Artists also can benefit from AI generated images, like for example to create reference images, which was pointed by Aaron Rutten in one of his recent videos.

I do not think the technology is bad per se. Just how it is handled may cause some issues.

youtube.com/watch?v=b8HX-qqdAS

YouTubeHow to Use NVIDIA CANVAS & GauGAN2 (Tutorial)By Aaron Rutten
Quiet public
grob 🇺🇦

@the_luck_witch @davidrevoy @aral
Yes, not bad per se, but I am very sceptical about proper attribution being done or even meaningful in this case given the huge number of contributers. How does that work if not blanket? Basically the model. Will artists really like that? Maybe just buy artists' waiving of crediting? Is that even feasible given the large amount of training artworks? It's not for any artist so possibility of deletion/opt-out is great.

Quiet public
Pagan Witch

@grob @davidrevoy @aral I never said there should not be an option to opt out, it was included in "consent" part of my reply.

ExploreLive feeds
About